Thursday, December 26, 2024
|
||
46° |
Dec 26's Weather Clouds HI: 49 LOW: 43 Full Forecast (powered by OpenWeather) |
Free Daily Headlines
The Henderson County Board of Commissioners on Wednesday delayed action on a rezoning application for the 900-unit Tap Root Farms subdivision in an effort to work out an agreement on conditions the county wants to impose.
The proposed development of 891 townhomes and single-family homes on the Tap Root dairy farm property on Butler Bridge Road had drawn strong opposition from neighboring homeowners and the Asheville Regional Airport. On Wednesday morning, Cindy Rice, of the airport board, and Lew Bleiweis, the airport's executive director, repeated the airport's opposition to the development based on the noise, the potential hazard caused by dozens of overflights per week and the likelihood that residents would eventually complain about the air traffic overhead.
Commissioner Bill Lapsley served as chair for the discussion. Grady Hawkins recused himself because his wife is the sister of one of the property owners.
Lapsley reminded the board of concerns that commissioners had raised. "The county attorney and I have met with the developer and their civil engineer on four occsions to review the items the commissioners raised at the last meeting," including design. The developer made "signficant changes" as a result, Lapsley said. Those included:
Other changes:
The developer agrees with the conditions except for a larger setback requirement, Bob Oates, the developer's attorney, said. He asked the board to delay a decision to give the developer time to work out the details of the setback condition.
Commissioner Rebecca McCall recommended, because of the airport flight path, a maximum light pole height of 25-feet and to protect homeowners a light wattage that minimizes glare.
She said later she still has concerns about the size of the project.
"There's a lot of things that would have to change before I could commit for it," she said. She said she appreciated the developer's willingness to make concessions based on the board's concern. "But I continue to think it's still too large for the community."
Commissioner Michael Edney questioned the value of the property the developer would donate because it's in floodplain.
"It seems to me it's worthless for us to take this land because there's nothing we can do with it of value," he said. "It will cost a lot more to keep it up than anything we can do with it."
The county's original land-use plan designated the property as residential. The Board of Commissioners then rezoned it "hoping to get some industrial or commercial out there," Commissioner Charlie Messer said. "Otherwise, this property probably would have been semi-developed now."
Messer praised the development team because it had made compromises, reduced the total number of units and agreed to numerous conditions.
"I think it's a resonable document," he said. The developer "has reached out and tried to accommodate Henderson County."
McCall said she wanted to see the density even lower and did not want to reduce to any less than 20 feet.